Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ethics of Discourse Analysis

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity

  • 1163 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses ethical dilemmas and questions of integrity characteristic of the conduct of discourse analysis (DA). Following a general introduction to the ethics and integrity of DA, the text expands on three discourse analytic approaches: discursive psychology, narrative inquiry, and critical discourse analysis. The chapter presents how ethical and integrity concerns manifest themselves and how they may be addressed in regard to the specifics of each of these forms of DA. Readers are introduced to the basic principles of research ethics – such as voluntary and informed consent, confidentiality and anonymity, and minimizing harm – as well as those distinctive to the interpretive and critical endeavors characteristic of much DA. These closely relate to questions of research integrity, and more specifically to the grounds of analysts’ interpretations, representation of research participants, and the place of discourse scholars’ critique and application of their analyses. The chapter concludes by calling for a continual and honest discussion of ethical dilemmas if we are to ensure that consideration of ethics becomes inherent to any discourse analytic endeavor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams TE (2008) A review of narrative ethics. Qual Inq 14(2):175–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antaki C, Billig M, Edwards D et al (2003) Discourse analysis means doing analysis: a critique of six analytic shortcomings. Discourse Analysis Online 1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker P, Ellece S (2011) Key terms in discourse analysis. Continuum, London/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger Gluck S (2014) Reflecting on the quantum leap: promises and perils of oral history on the web. Oral Hist Rev 41(2):244–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce A, Beuthin R, Sheilds L et al (2016) Narrative research evolving: evolving through narrative research. Int J Qual Methods 15(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caine V, Murphy MS, Estefan A et al (2017) Exploring the purposes of fictionalization in narrative inquiry. Qual Inq 23(3):215–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase SE (1996) Personal vulnerability and interpretive authority in narrative research. In: Josselson R (ed) Ethics and process in the narrative study of lives. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, pp 45–59

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chase SE (2005) Narrative inquiry: multiple lenses, approaches, voices. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) The SAGE handbook of qualitative research, 3rd edn. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, pp 651–679

    Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin DJ, Connelly FM (2000) Narrative inquiry: experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin DJ, Caine V, Lessard S (2018) The relational ethics of narrative inquiry. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards D (2012) Discursive and scientific psychology. Br J Soc Psychol 51(3):425–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis C (2007) Telling secrets, revealing lives: relational ethics in research with intimate others. Qual Inq 13(1):3–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etherington K (2007) Ethical research in reflexive relationships. Qual Inq 13(5):599–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough N (1989) Language and power. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough N, Fairclough I (2018) A procedural approach to ethical critique in CDA. Crit Discourse Stud 15(2):169–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee JP (2011) An introduction to discourse analysis: theory and method, 3rd edn. Routledge, New York/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham P (2018) Ethics in critical discourse analysis. Crit Discourse Stud 15(2):186–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley M (1997) On the foundations of critical discourse analysis. Lang Commun 17(3):237–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley M (2014) On the ethics of interviewing for discourse analysis. Qual Res 14(5):529–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hepburn A (2006) Getting closer at a distance: theory and the contingencies of practice. Theory Psychol 16(3):327–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hepburn A, Potter J (2004) Discourse analytic practice. In: Seale C, Gobo G, Gubrium JF et al (eds) Qualitative research practice. SAGE, London, pp 168–185

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hepburn A, Wiggins S (eds) (2007) Discursive research in practice: new approaches to psychology and interaction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog B (2016) Discourse analysis as social critique: discursive and non-discursive realities in critical social research. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog B (2018) Suffering as an anchor of critique: the place of critique in critical discourse studies. Crit Discourse Stud 15(2):111–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Josselson R (1996) Introduction. In: Josselson R (ed) Ethics and process in the narrative study of lives. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, pp xi–xviii

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Josselson R (2007) The ethical attitude in narrative research: principles and practicalities. In: Clandinin DJ (ed) Handbook of narrative inquiry: mapping a methodology. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, pp 537–566

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lieblich A (1996) Some unforeseen outcomes of conducting narrative research with people of one’s own culture. In: Josselson R (ed) Ethics and process in the narrative study of lives. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, pp 172–184

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lieblich A (2006) Vicissitudes: a study, a book, a play: lessons from the work of a narrative scholar. Qual Inq 12(1):60–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter J (2010) Contemporary discursive psychology: issues, prospects, and Corcoran’s awkward ontology. Br J Soc Psychol 49(4):657–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter J (2012a) Discourse analysis and discursive psychology. In: Cooper H, Camic PH, Long DL et al (eds) APA handbook of research methods in psychology:Vol. 2, Research designs: quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 119–138

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Potter J (2012b) Re-reading discourse and social psychology: transforming social psychology. Br J Soc Psychol 51(3):436–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter J, Wetherell M (1987) Discourse and social psychology: beyond attitudes and behaviour. SAGE, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapley T (2007) Doing conversation, discourse and document analysis. SAGE, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reisigl M, Wodak R (2001) Discourse and discrimination: rhetorics of racism and antisemitism. Routledge, London/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Roderick I (2018) Multimodal critical discourse analysis as ethical praxis. Crit Discourse Stud 15(2):154–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabar G, Sabar Ben-Yehoshua N (2017) ‘I’ll sue you if you publish my wife’s interview’: ethical dilemmas in qualitative research based on life stories. Qual Res 17(4):408–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smythe WE, Murray MJ (2000) Owning the story: ethical considerations in narrative research. Ethics Behav 10(4):311–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokoe E, Hepburn A, Antaki C (2012) Beware the ‘Loughborough School’ of social psychology? Interaction and the politics of intervention. Br J Soc Psychol 51(3):486–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor S (2001a) Evaluating and applying discourse analytic research. In: Wetherell M, Taylor S, Yates SJ (eds) Discourse as data: a guide for analysis. SAGE, London, pp 311–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor S (2001b) Locating and conducting discourse analytic research. In: Wetherell M, Taylor S, Yates SJ (eds) Discourse as data: a guide for analysis. SAGE, London, pp 5–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor S, Smith R (2014) The ethics of interviewing for discourse analysis: responses to Martyn Hammersley. Qual Res 14(5):542–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk TA (1993) Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse Soc 4(2):249–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk TA (2008) Critical discourse analysis and nominalization: problem or pseudo-problem? Discourse Soc 19(6):821–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Leeuwen T (2018) Moral evaluation in critical discourse analysis. Crit Discourse Stud 15(2):140–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins S (2017) Discursive psychology: theory, method and applications. SAGE, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins S, Potter J (2017) Discursive psychology. In: Willig C, Stainton Rogers W (eds) The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology. SAGE, London, pp 93–109

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Willig C (2004) Discourse analysis and health psychology. In: Murray M (ed) Critical health psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke/New York, pp 155–169

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wodak R (2001) The discourse-historical approach. In: Wodak R, Meyer M (eds) Methods of critical discourse analysis. SAGE, London, pp 63–94

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wood LA, Kroger RO (2000) Doing discourse analysis: methods for studying action in talk and text. SAGE, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

    Meta Gorup

Authors
  1. Meta Gorup
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meta Gorup .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Chatelaillon Plage, France

    Ron Iphofen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Gorup, M. (2019). Ethics of Discourse Analysis. In: Iphofen, R. (eds) Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_22-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_22-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76040-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76040-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation