Skip to main content

Ant Mosaics

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Social Insects

Ant mosaics occur when two or more competitively dominant ant species show a nonoverlapping, checkerboard-like spatial distribution pattern within a forest or other habitat. Such a pattern was originally described by Room in 1971 [10] and termed an ant mosaic 2 years later by Leston [7]. Since then, ant mosaics have been studied across different continents and habitats. Among social insects, mosaic-like distribution patterns are not exclusive to ants and have been found for termites as well [6].

Ant colonies commonly vigorously defend their nest sites, and aggression against non-nestmates often extends well beyond the nest entrance, sometimes involving territorial exclusion of other ant species. As a result, competitively superior ant species with relatively large colonies and an aggressive behavioral dominance of other species are expected to mutually exclude each other from their territories. Ant species co-existing within the territories of dominant ants are regarded as...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Blüthgen, N., & Stork, N. E. (2007). Ant mosaics in a tropical rainforest in Australia and elsewhere: A critical review. Austral Ecology, 32, 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Davidson, D. W. (1997). The role of resource imbalances in the evolutionary ecology of tropical arboreal ants. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 61, 153–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dejean, A., Corbara, B., Orivel, J., & Leponce, M. (2007). Rainforest canopy ants: The implications of territoriality and predatory behavior. Functional Ecosystems and Communities, 1, 105–120.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fayle, T. M., Turner, E. C., & Foster, W. A. (2013). Ant mosaics occur in SE Asian oil palm plantation but not rain forest and are influenced by the presence of nest-sites and non-native species. Ecography, 36, 1051–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gibb, H., & Hochuli, D. F. (2004). Removal experiment reveals limited effects of an behaviorally dominant species on ant assemblages. Ecology, 85, 648–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Leponce, M., Roisin, Y., & Pasteels, J. M. (1997). Structure and dynamics of the arboreal termite community in New Guinean coconut plantations. Biotropica, 29, 193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Leston, D. (1973). The ant mosaic – Tropical tree crops and the limiting of pests and diseases. PANS (Pest Articles and News Summaries), 19, 311–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Majer, J. D. (1976). The ant mosaic in Ghana cocoa farms: Further structural considerations. Journal of Applied Ecology, 13, 145–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ribas, C. R., & Schoereder, J. H. (2002). Are all ant mosaics caused by competition? Oecologia, 131, 606–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Room, P. M. (1971). The relative distributions of ant species in Ghana’s cocoa farms. Journal of Animal Ecology, 40, 735–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nico Blüthgen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Blüthgen, N. (2020). Ant Mosaics. In: Starr, C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Social Insects. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90306-4_9-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90306-4_9-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90306-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90306-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics