Skip to main content

Spatial Vision and Pattern Perception

  • Reference work entry
Handbook of Visual Display Technology
  • 1269 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter deals with the visual system’s sensitivity to contrast and the various ways by which it is affected. Specifically, contrast detection and discrimination thresholds, and superimposed and lateral masking effects will be discussed. Effects of pattern adaptation and the consequent modification of the contrast sensitivity function will also be discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

CSF:

Contrast Sensitivity Function

MTF:

Modulation Transfer Function

FACT:

Functional Acuity Contrast Test

cpd:

Cycles Per Degree

References

  1. Davila KD, Geisler WS (1991) The relative contributions of pre-neural and neural factors to areal summation in the fovea. Vis Res 31:1369–1380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Westheimer G (1965) Spatial interaction in the human retina. J Physiol 181:881–894

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vassilev A, Ivanov I, Zlatkova MB, Anderson RS (2005) Human S-cone vision: relationship between perceptive field and ganglion cell dendritic field. J Vis 5:823–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barlow HB (1958) Temporal and spatial summation in human vision at different background intensities. J Physiol 141:337–350

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schefrin BE, Bieber ML, McLean R, Werner JS (1998) The area of complete scotopic spatial summation enlarges with age. J Opt Soc Am A 15:340–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pelli DG, Zhang L (1991) Accurate control of contrast on microcomputer displays. Vis Res 31:1337–1350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pelli DG, Robson JG, Wilkins AJ (1988) The design of a new letter chart for measuring contrast sensitivity. Clin Vis Sci 2:187–199

    Google Scholar 

  8. Elliott DB, Sanderson K, Conkey A (1990) The reliability of the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity chart. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 10:21–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Atchison DA, Woods RL, Bradley A (1998) Predicting the effects of optical defocus on human contrast sensitivity. J Opt Soc Am A 15:2536–2544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hess R, Woo G (1978) Vision through cataracts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 17:428–435

    Google Scholar 

  11. Strang NC, Atchison DA, Woods RL (1999) Effects of defocus and pupil size on human contrast sensitivity. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 19:415–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Crassini B, Brown B, Bowman K (1988) Age-related changes in contrast sensitivity in central and peripheral retina. Perception 17:315–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bour LJ, Apkarian P (1996) Selective broad-band spatial frequency loss in contrast sensitivity functions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 37:2475–2482

    Google Scholar 

  14. Van Nes FL, Bouman M (1967) Spatial modulation transfer in the human eye. J Opt Soc Am 57:401–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. De Valois RL, Morgan H, Snodderly DM (1974) Psychophysical studies of monkey vision-III. Spatial luminance contrast sensitivity tests of macaque and human observers. Vis Res 14:75–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Blakemore C, Campbell FW (1969) On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. J Physiol 203:237–260

    Google Scholar 

  17. Graham N (1992) Visual pattern analyzers. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Adini Y, Sagi D, Tsodykes M (1997) Excitatory – inhibitory networks in the visual cortex: psychophysical evidence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:10246–10231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Foley JM (1994) Human luminance pattern-vision mechanisms: masking experiments require a new model. J Opt Soc Am A 11:1710–1719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Campbell FW, Green DG (1965) Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. J Physiol 181:576–593

    Google Scholar 

  21. Foley JM, Chen C-C (1999) Patten detection in the presence of maskers that differ in spatial phase and temporal offset: threshold measurements and a model. Vis Res 39:3855–3872

    Article  Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • De Valois R, De Valois K (1988) Spatial vision. Oxford Science Publication, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapley R, Man-Kit Lam D (1992) Contrast sensitivity. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Srinivasa Varadharajan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Cite this entry

Varadharajan, L.S. (2012). Spatial Vision and Pattern Perception. In: Chen, J., Cranton, W., Fihn, M. (eds) Handbook of Visual Display Technology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79567-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics