Abstract
Historical research provides special challenges to sociological analysis because it focuses on the description of particular situations. This focus makes many traditional sociological methods difficult for historical work. The grounded theory approach developed by Glaser and Strauss (a form of comparative analysis) allows researchers to concentrate on understanding what happened in a set of particular circumstances while retaining the usefulness of relatively abstract analyses. This paper provides a rationale for historical analysis as “getting the story straight”, as well as suggestions for conducting an effective analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Notes
- 1.
On the reception of pragmatism, Symbolic Interactionism, and Grounded Theory in German speaking sociology see Bergmann/Hildenbrand as well as Ploder in the first volume of this handbook.
References
Becker, Howard S. 1997. Tricks of the trade: How to think about your research while you’re doing it. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Becker, Howard S. 2007. Telling about society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Becker, Howard S. 2014. What about Mozart? What about murder? Reasoning from cases. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Cartwright, Nancy, und Jeremy Hardie. 2012. Evidence-based policy: A practical guide to doing it better. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Charmaz, Kathy. 2014. Constructing grounded theory, 2 ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Gerson, Elihu M. 1991. Supplementing grounded theory. In Social organization and social process: Essays in honor of Anselm Strauss, Hrsg. D. Maines, 285–302. Chicago: Aldine de Gruyter.
Gerson, Elihu M. 2009. Specialty boundaries, compound problems, and collaborative complexity. Biological Theory 4: 247–252. doi:10.1162/biot.2009.4.3.247.
Glaser, Barney G., and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
Jonas, Gerald. 1989. The circuit riders: Rockefeller money and the rise of modern science. New York: Norton.
Lieberson, Stanley. 1985. Making it count: The improvement of social research and theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Strauss, Anselm L. 1987. Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Winsor, Mary P. 1991. Reading the shape of nature: Comparative zoology at the Agassiz museum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to Anselm Strauss, Howard S. Becker, and William C. Wimsatt for instruction and discussions over many years of the ideas presented here. I am also grateful to M. Sue Gerson, William Glen, James R. Griesemer, Jane Maienschein, and Jan Sapp for comments on earlier versions, to Andrea Ploder for comments and suggestions, and to M. Sue Gerson for continuing support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH
About this entry
Cite this entry
Gerson, E.M. (2016). Grounded Theory Methodology for the History of Sociology. In: Moebius, S., Ploder, A. (eds) Handbuch Geschichte der deutschsprachigen Soziologie. Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07999-4_16-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07999-4_16-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-07999-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-07999-4
eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Sozialwissenschaften und Recht
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Grounded Theory Methodology for the History of Sociology- Published:
- 06 January 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07999-4_16-2
-
Original
Grounded Theory Methodology for the History of Sociology- Published:
- 23 March 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07999-4_16-1