Zusammenfassung
Group Awareness bezeichnet die individuelle Wahrnehmung bestimmter Eigenschaften einer Gruppe oder ihrer Mitglieder. Sie erleichtert kollaborative Lernaktivitäten und kann durch spezifische Tools unterstützt werden, die Informationen erfassen, transformieren und darstellen. Empirische Studien haben insbesondere für kognitive Group Awareness-Tools gezeigt, dass Lernprozesse und -ergebnisse auf individueller und sozialer Ebene verbessert werden können. Eine systematischere Differenzierung von Tool-Funktionen und ihrer Effekte kann den Einsatz in unterschiedlichen Bildungskontexten erleichtern.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Literatur
Alavi, H. S., & Dillenbourg, P. (2012). An ambient awareness tool for supporting supervised collaborative problem solving. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 5(3), 264–274. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2012.7.
Bodemer, D. (2011). Tacit guidance for collaborative multimedia learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1079–1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.016.
Bodemer, D., & Dehler, J. (2011). Group awareness in CSCL environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1043–1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.014.
Bodemer, D., & Scholvien, A. (2014). Providing knowledge-related partner information in collaborative multimedia learning: Isolating the core of cognitive group awareness tools. In C.-C. Liu, H. Ogata, S. C. Kong & A. Kashihara (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on computers in education ICCE 2014 (S. 171–179). Nara, Japan.
Buder, J. (2011). Group awareness tools for learning: Current and future directions. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1114–1117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.012.
Buder, J., & Bodemer, D. (2008). Supporting controversial CSCL discussions with augmented group awareness tools. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(2), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-008-9037-5.
Buder, J., & Bodemer, D. (2011). Group awareness tools for controversial CSCL discussions: Dissociating rating effects and visualized feedback effetcs. In H. Spada, G. Stahl, N. Miyake & N. Law (Hrsg.), Connecting computer-supported collaborative learning to policy and practice: CSCL2011 conference proceedings: Vol. 1 (S. 358–365). Hong Kong.
Buder, J., Schwind, C., Rudat, A., & Bodemer, D. (2015). Selective reading of large online forum discussions: The impact of rating visualizations on navigation and learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.043.
Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine & S. D. Teasley (Hrsg.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (S. 127–149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Cress, U. (2008). The need for considering multilevel analysis in CSCL research – An appeal for the use of more advanced statistical methods. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-007-9032-2.
Dehler, J., Bodemer, D., Buder, J., & Hesse, F. W. (2011). Guiding knowledge communication in CSCL via group knowledge awareness. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1068–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.018.
Dourish, P., & Bellotti, V. (1992). Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In M. Mantel & R. Baecker (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work (S. 107–114). Toronto: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/143457.143468.
Engelmann, T., & Hesse, F. W. (2011). Fostering sharing of unshared knowledge by having access to the collaborators’ meta-knowledge structures. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 2078–2087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.06.002.
Engelmann, T., Dehler, J., Bodemer, D., & Buder, J. (2009). Knowledge awareness in CSCL: A psychological perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4), 949–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.04.004.
Erkens, M., Bodemer, D., & Hoppe, H. U. (2016). Improving collaborative learning in the classroom: Design and evaluation of a text mining based grouping and representing. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(4), 387–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-016-9243-5.
Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., & Wecker, C. (2013). Toward a script theory of guidance in computer-supported collaborative learning. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.748005.
Gijlers, H., & de Jong, T. (2009). Sharing and confronting propositions in collaborative inquiry learning. Cognition and Instruction, 27(3), 239–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000903014352.
Gross, T., Stary, C., & Totter, A. (2005). User-centered awareness in computer-supported cooperative work-systems: Structured embedding of findings from social sciences. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 18(3), 323–360. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327590ijhc1803_5.
Heimbuch, S., & Bodemer, D. (2017). Controversy awareness on evidence-led discussions as guidance for students in wiki-based learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.12.001.
Janssen, J., & Bodemer, D. (2013). Coordinated computer-supported collaborative learning: Awareness and awareness tools. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.749153.
Janssen, J., Erkens, G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2011a). Group awareness tools: It’s what you do with it that matters. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1046–1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.002.
Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kanselaar, G. (2011b). Multilevel analysis in CSCL research. In S. Puntambekar, G. Erkens & C. Hmelo-Silver (Hrsg.), Analyzing interactions in CSCL (S. 187–205). Boston: Springer. http://link.springer.com/chapter https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7710-6_9.
Jermann, P., & Dillenbourg, P. (2008). Group mirrors to support interaction regulation in collaborative problem solving. Computers & Education, 51(1), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.012.
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2008). Group awareness and self-presentation in computer-supported information exchange. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(1), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-007-9027-z.
Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2009). Visualization of group members’ participation: How information-presentation formats support information exchange. Social Science Computer Review, 27(2), 243–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439309332312.
Lin, J.-W., & Lai, Y.-C. (2013). Online formative assessments with social network awareness. Computers & Education, 66, 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.008.
Lin, J.-W., Lai, Y.-C., Lai, Y.-C., & Chang, L.-C. (2016). Fostering self-regulated learning in a blended environment using group awareness and peer assistance as external scaffolds. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12120.
Miller, M., & Hadwin, A. (2015). Scripting and awareness tools for regulating collaborative learning: Changing the landscape of support in CSCL. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 573–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.050.
Phielix, C., Prins, F. J., Kirschner, P. A., Erkens, G., & Jaspers, J. (2011). Group awareness of social and cognitive performance in a CSCL environment: Effects of a peer feedback and reflection tool. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1087–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.024.
Puhl, T., Tsovaltzi, D., & Weinberger, A. (2015). Blending Facebook discussions into seminars for practicing argumentation. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 605–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.006.
Sangin, M., Molinari, G., Nüssli, M.-A., & Dillenbourg, P. (2011). Facilitating peer knowledge modeling: Effects of a knowledge awareness tool on collaborative learning outcomes and processes. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1059–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.032.
Schmidt, K., & Randall, D. (Hrsg.). (2016). Reconsidering „Awareness“ in CSCW [Special Issue]. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 25(4–5), 229–423.
Schnaubert, L., & Bodemer, D. (2016). How socio-cognitive information affects individual study decisions. In C.-K. Looi, J. Polman, U. Cress & P. Reimann (Hrsg.), Transforming learning, empowering learners: The International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2016 (S. 274–281). Singapore: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Schnaubert, L., & Bodemer, D. (2017). Prompting and visualising monitoring outcomes: Guiding self-regulatory processes with confidence judgments. Learning and Instruction, 49, 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.03.004.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Bodemer, D., Schnaubert, L. (2018). Group Awareness-Tools beim technologieunterstützen Lernen. In: Niegemann, H., Weinberger, A. (eds) Lernen mit Bildungstechnologien. Springer Reference Psychologie . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54373-3_30-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54373-3_30-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-54373-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-54373-3
eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Psychologie