Skip to main content

Mississippi Watershed and the Role of Wetlands in Flood Management

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Wetland Book

Abstract

The Mississippi River is the longest river in North America and the fourth longest in the world. The Mississippi-Ohio-Missouri (MOM) watershed, including the Arkansas River, covers some 4.76 million square kilometers encompassing approximately 40% of the conterminous United States of America. The watershed comprises several major sub-catchments and ultimately discharges into the Gulf of Mexico through the Mississippi Deltaic Plan (MDP). Within the last 100 years, the MDP has experienced relative sea level rise as the surface area has been reduced and wetlands lost. Much of the wetland loss has been associated with wider activities across the watershed that have reduced sediment input to the river and consequently to the wetlands. This, combined with the likely increased intensity of tropical storms as a result of climate change and the ongoing loss of wetlands which offer protection from coastal storm surges, will increase the vulnerability to flooding of near coastal human settlements and infrastructure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Black H. Unnatural disaster—human factors in the Mississippi floods. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116(9):A390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britsch LD, Dunbar JB. Land loss rates: Louisiana coastal plain. J Coast Res. 1993:324–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Changnon SA. The historical struggle with floods on the Mississippi River basin: impacts of recent floods and lessons for future flood management and policy. Water Int. 1998;23(4):263–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, Mitsch WJ, Day Jr JW. A new vision for New Orleans and the Mississippi delta: applying ecological economics and ecological engineering. Front Ecol Environ. 2006;4(9):465–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day JW, Boesch DF, Clairain EJ, Kemp GP, Laska SB, Mitsch WJ, et al. Restoration of the Mississippi Delta: lessons from hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Science. 2007;315(5819):1679–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dierauer J, Pinter N, Remo JW. Evaluation of levee setbacks for flood-loss reduction, Middle Mississippi River, USA. J Hydrol. 2012;450:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink DF, Mitsch WJ. Seasonal and storm event nutrient removal by a created wetland in an agricultural watershed. Ecol Eng. 2004;23(4):313–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galat DL, Fredrickson LH, Humburg DD, Bataille KJ, Bodie JR, Dohrenwend J, et al. Flooding to restore connectivity of regulated, large-river wetlands natural and controlled flooding as complementary processes along the lower Missouri River. Bioscience. 1998;48(9):721–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hey DL, Philippi NS. Flood reduction through wetland restoration: the Upper Mississippi River Basin as a case history. Restor Ecol. 1995;3(1):4–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch WJ, Day JW. Restoration of wetlands in the Mississippi–Ohio–Missouri (MOM) River Basin: experience and needed research. Ecol Eng. 2006;26(1):55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen JR, Stedinger JR, Matalas NC, Stakhiv EZ. Climate variability and flood frequency estimation for the upper Mississippi and lower Missouri rivers. J Am Water Resour Assoc. 1999;35(6):1509–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert J. McInnes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

McInnes, R. (2018). Mississippi Watershed and the Role of Wetlands in Flood Management. In: Finlayson, C.M., et al. The Wetland Book. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9659-3_217

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics