Skip to main content

Place Utility

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Migration

Definition

The concept of place utility was introduced in a pair of articles published in the mid-1960s by Princeton geographer Julian Wolpert. In the first (1965), he coined the term “place utility” to describe “the net composite of utilities which are derived from the individual’s integration at some position in space.” Based on past experiences, both positive and negative, the individual measures the utility of the place in which he/she presently resides. According to Wolpert, place utility is operationalized by migrants or potential migrants who assess the outstanding attributes of their current place of residence relative to those same aggregate characteristics of a potential place of migration destination. Traditionally, most migrants have little or no personal experience in the potential destination. They make a judgment based on information they hear or read about, rather than from personal experience. In sum, Wolpert theorized that people will base their migration decisions...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams H, Neil Adger W (2013) The contribution of ecosystem services to place utility as a determinant of migration decision-making. Environ Res Lett 8(1):015006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker RGV (1982) Place utility fields. Geogr Anal 14(1):10–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilsborrow RE, Oberai AS et al (eds) (1984) Migration surveys in low-income countries: guidelines and questionnaire design. Croom-Helm, London, 552 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr DL (2008) Migration to the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala: why place matters. Hum Organ 67(1):37–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datta A (2003) Human migration: a social phenomenon. Mittal Publications, New Delhi, pp 25, 26

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong GF, Gardner RW (eds) (1981) Migration decision making: multidisciplinary approaches to microlevel studies in developed and developing countries. Pergamon Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham AS, Champion T, Wymer C, Coombes M (2000) Measuring destination attractivity: a migration example. Int J Popul Geogr 6(6):391–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldscheider C (1971) Theoretical issues in migration research. Population, modernization, and social structure. Little, Brown, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Janelle DG (1969) Spatial reorganization: a model and concept. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 59(2):348–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kok P (2006) Migration in south and southern Africa: dynamics and determinants. HSRC Press, Cape Town, pp 275, 276

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert J (1965) Behavioral aspects of the decision to migrate. Pap Reg Sci Assoc 15:159–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert J (1966) Migration as an adjustment to environmental stress. J Soc Issues 22(4):92–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Arthur JA (2008) The African Diaspora in the United States and Europe: the Ghanaian experience. Ashgate, Hampshire, pp 27, 28

    Google Scholar 

  • Bible DS, Brown LA (1981) Place utility, attribute tradeoff, and choice behavior in an intra-urban migration context. Socioecon Plann Sci 15(1):37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown L, Horton F et al (1970) On place utility and the normative allocation of intra-urban migrants. Demography 7:175–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findley AM, Li F (1999) Methodological issues in researching migration. Prof Geogr 51(1):50–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golledge RG, Stimson RJ (1997) Spatial behavior: a geographic perspective. Guilford Press, New York, pp 414–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry S, Bilsborrow R (2006) How migrants choose their destination in Burkina Faso? A place-utility approach. Papers of the European population conference 2006. Liverpool, June 21–24 Session 32 “Population, development and environment in developing countries” http://epc2006.princeton.edu/papers/60302

  • Hugo G (1981) Village-community ties, the village norms, and ethnic and social networks: a review of evidence from the Third World. In: Jong GFD, Gardner RW (eds) Migration decision making: multidisciplinary approaches to micro-level studies in developed and developing countries. Pergamon Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee ES (1966) A theory of migration. Demography 3:47–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Carr D (2012) Agro-ecological determinants of rural out-migration to the Maya biosphere reserve, Guatemala. Environ Res Lett 7(4):045603. pp 7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey DS (1990) Social structure, household strategies, and the cumulative causation of migration. Popul Index 56(1):3–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravenstein EG (1889) The laws of migration. J R Stat Soc 52:241–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood C (1982) Equilibrium and historical-structural perspectives on migration. Int Migr Rev 16(2):298–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David López-Carr .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

López-Carr, D., Phillips, D. (2015). Place Utility. In: Bean, F., Brown, S. (eds) Encyclopedia of Migration. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6179-7_42-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6179-7_42-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6179-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics