Abstract
Adam Wodeham (d. 1358) is an Oxford Franciscan protégé of Ockham and influential adherent of Ockham’s philosophical approach in the years of Oxford’s “Golden Age” of theology. Wodeham’s most important philosophical innovation was the “complex significable,” akin to the contemporary idea of States of Affairs. He developed this in his epistemological project of ascertaining what we understand when we claim knowledge of things in the world. Ockham had held that the objects of scientific knowledge are mental propositions in which the concept naturally signifies the perceived objects, which led to questions about whether we make judgments about mental propositions or things. Wodeham’s innovation was to argue that we formulate judgments about things in the world when things conform to the way the mind formulates propositions about them. While this does not introduce a new layer of ontological complexity to the extramental world, it does focus attention on the natural method by which we propositionalize what we perceive. Wodeham’s doctrine of complex significables was to be influential in later scholastic epistemological discourse, and it contributed importantly to the logico-semantic approach of Oxford theology. Wodeham was also an important opponent of spatiotemporal atomism, a view that arose within the philosophical speculation about how to mathematize our understanding of the physical world that characterizes the thought of the Mertonian “Calculators.”
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Bibliography
Primary Sources
Mair, J. (1512). Super Quattuor libros sententiarum: Abbrevatio Henrici Totting de Oyta, Abbreviated Oxford lectures. In J. Mair (Ed.). Paris.
Mair, J. (1966). Quaestio de divisione et compositione continui. In J. Murdoch (Ed.), Two questions on the continuum. Francisc Stud 26:212–288.
Mair, J. (1988). In R. Wood (Ed.), Tratatus de indivisibilibus. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Rega, W., & Gideon, G. (Eds.). (1990). Lectura secunda, 3 vols (Norwich lectures). St. Bonaventure: Franciscan Institute.
Secondary Sources
Brower-Toland, S. (2006). Facts vs. things: Adam Wodeham and the later medieval debate about objects of knowledge. The Review of Metaphysics, 60, 597–642.
Courtenay, W. (1978). Adam Wodeham. Leiden: Brill.
Gál, G. (1977). Adam of Wodeham’s question on the ‘complexe significabile’ as the immediate object of scientific knowledge. Franciscan Studies, 73, 66–102.
Gelber, H. (1974). Logic and the trinity: A clash of values in scholastic thought, 1300–1335. PhD dissertation. University of Wisconsin.
Grassi, O. (1986). Intuizione e significato: Adam Wodeham ed il problema della conoscenza nel XIV secolo. Milan: Editoriale Jaco.
Karger, E. (1995). William of Ockham, Walter Chatton, and Adam Wodeham on the objects of knowledge and belief. Vivarium, 33(2), 171–196.
Karger, E. (2004). Ockham and Wodeham on divine deception as a skeptical hypothesis. Vivarium, 42(2), 225–236.
Keele, R. (2003). The so-called ‘Res’ theory of Walter Chatton. Franciscan Studies, 61, 37–53.
Kretzman, N. (1984). Adam Wodeham’s anti-Aristotelian anti-atomism. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 4, 381–398.
Lenz, M. (2001). Adam de Wodeham und die Entdeckung des Sachverhalts. In B. Mojsisch (Ed.), Umbrüche: Historische Wendepunkt der Philosophie von der Antike bis zur Neuzeit (pp. 99–116). Grüner: John Benjamins Publishers.
Nuchelmans, G. (1980). Adam Wodeham on the meaning of declarative sentences. Historiography Linguistics, 7(1/2), 177–187.
Perler, D. (2005). Emotions and cognitions: Fourteenth century discussions of the passions of the soul. Vivarium, 43(2), 250–274.
Reina, M. E. (1986). Cognizione intuitiva ed esperienza interiore in Adamo Wodeham. Rivista di Storia della Filosofia, 41, 19–49. 211–244.
Schabel, C. (2002). Oxford Franciscans after Ockham: Walter Chatton and Adam Wodeham. In G. R. Evans (Ed.), Medieval commentaries on the ‘sentences’ of Peter Lombard, Current research (Vol. I, pp. 359–377). Brill: Leiden.
Spade, P. V. (1988). Anselm and the background to Adam Wodeham’s theory of abstract and concrete terms. Rivista di Storia della Filosofia, 2, 261–271.
Sylla, E. D. (1998). God, indivisibles, and logic in the later Middle Ages: Adam Wodeham’s response to Henry Harclay. Medieval Philosophy and Theology, 7, 69–87.
Tachau, K. (1988). Vision and certitude in the age of Ockham. Leiden: Brill.
White, G. (1993). William Ockham and Adam Wodeham. Heythrop Journal, 34(3), 296–301.
Wood, R. (1982). Adam Wodeham on sensory illusions. Traditional, 38, 214–252.
Wood, R. (1989). Epistemology and omnipotence. In S. Chodorow & J. Sweeney (Eds.), Popes, teachers and canon law in the Middle Ages (pp. 160–178). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Wood, R. (1991). The Wodeham edition: Adam Wodeham’s ‘Lectura Secunda’. Franciscan Studies, 51, 103–115.
Wood, R. (2003). Adam of Wodeham. In J. J. E. Gracia & T. B. Noone (Eds.), A companion to philosophy in the Middle Ages, Blackwell companions to philosophy (Vol. 24, pp. 77–85). Oxford: Blackwell.
Zupko, J. (1994a). Nominalism meets indivisiblism. Medieval Philosophy and Theology, 3, 158–185.
Zupko, J. (1994–1997). How it played in the rue de Fouarre: The reception of Adam Wodeham’s theory of the complex significable in the arts faculty at Paris in the mid-fourteenth century. Franciscan Studies, 54, 211–225.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Lahey, S.E. (2018). Adam Wodeham. In: Lagerlund, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_11-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_11-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1151-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1151-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities