Abstract
Discourse analysis (DA) conceptualizes language as performative and productive, central to the construction of social reality and subjectivity. This chapter examines two identifiable, but overlapping, schools of DA, discursive psychology (DP) and Foucauldian discourse analysis (FDA). DP draws on the practices of ethnomethodology and conversations analysis and focuses on the action orientation of talk and text in social practice: what is the text doing, rather than what does the text mean, or “what is the text saying?” Analysis focuses on “interpretive repertoires” or “discourses”: sets of statements that reflect shared patterns of meaning. Foucauldian discourse analysis (FDA) originates within poststructuralist theory, influenced by the philosophical work of Michel Foucault. Within FDA, language is deemed to be constitutive of social life, making available certain subject positions, which influence and regulate subjectivity and experience – the way we think or feel, our sense of self, and the practices in which we engage. FDA is thus concerned with identifying discourses, the subject positions they open up (or disallow), and the implications of such positioning for subjectivity and social practice, rather than the form or structure of interaction within talk or text. Following discussion of a range of DP and FDA research studies, a detailed example of feminist FDA is provided, including steps of analysis, based on a study of women’s accounts of PMS (premenstrual syndrome). It is concluded that there is no one correct method of DA, as multiple methods have been identified, and practitioners interpret and present analyses in a range of different ways.
References
Bilić B, Georgaca E. Representations of ‘mental illness’ in Serbian newspapers: a critical discourse analysis. Qual Res Psychol. 2007;4(1–2):167–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780880701473573.
Billig M. Rhetorical and discursive analysis: how families talk about the royal family. In: Hayes N, editor. Doing qualitative analysis in psychology. Hove: Psychology press; 1997.
Billig M. Undisciplined beginnings, academic success, and discursive psychology. Br J Soc Psychol. 2012;51(3):413–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02086.x.
Boydell KM, Hodgins M, Gladstone BM, Stasiulis E, Belliveau G, Cheu H, … Parsons J. Arts-based health research and academic legitimacy: transcending hegemonic conventions. Qual Res. 2016;16(6):681–700. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794116630040
Burr V. Social constructionism. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2003.
Chrisler JC, Caplan P. The strange case of Dr. Jekyll and Ms Hyde: how PMS became a cultural phenomenon and a psychiatric disorder. Annu Rev Sex Res. 2002;13:274–306.
Churruca K, Ussher JM, Perz J. Just desserts? Exploring constructions of food in women’s experiences of bulimia. Qual Health Res. 2017;27(10):1491–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316672644.
Curl TS, Drew P. Contingency and action: a comparison of two forms of requesting. Res Lang Soc Interact. 2008;41(2):129–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810802028613.
Edwards D, Potter J. Discursive psychology. London: Sage; 1992.
Edwards D, Potter J. Discursive psychology, mental states and descriptions. In: Molder H, Potter J, editors. Conversation and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005. p. 241–59.
Fee D. Pathology and the postmodern: mental illness as discourse and experience. London: Sage; 2000.
Foucault M. The archeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. New York: Pantheon Books; 1972.
Foucault M. Mental illness and psychology. Berkley: University of California Press (first published 1976); 1987.
Gavey N. Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis: contributions to feminist psychology. Psychol Women Q. 1989;13(1):459–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684310395916.
Gavey N. Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis revisited. Psychol Women Q. 2011;35(1):183–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684310395916.
Hankivsky O, Cormier R. Intersectionality: moving women’s health research and policy forward. Vancouver: Women’s Health Research Network; 2009. http://www.whrn.ca/intersectionality-download.php.
Hollway W. Heterosexual sex: power and desire for the other. In: Cartledge S, Ryan J, editors. Sex and love: new thoughts on old contradictions. London: Women’s Press; 1983. p. 124–40.
Hollway W. Subjectivity and method in psychology: gender, meaning and science. London: Sage; 1989.
King M, Ussher JM, Perz J. Representations of PMS and premenstrual women in men’s accounts: an analysis of online posts from PMSBuddy.com. Womens Reprod Health. 2014;1(1):3–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/23293691.2014.901796.
LaFrance MN. A bitter pill. A discursive analysis of women’s medicalized accounts of depression. J Health Psychol. 2007;12(1):127–40.
Lafrance MN, Stelzl M, Bullock K. “I’m not Gonna fake it”: University women’s accounts of resisting the normative practice of faking orgasm. Psychol Women Q. 2017;41(2):210–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316683520.
Larsson P, Loewenthal D, Brooks O. Counselling psychology and schizophrenia: a critical discursive account. Couns Psychol Q. 2012;25(1):31–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2012.662785.
Malson H. The thin woman: feminism, post-structuralism and the social psychology of anorexia nervosa. London: Routledge; 1998.
McHoul A, Rapley M. A case of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder diagnosis: Sir Karl and Francis B. Slug it out on the consulting room floor. Discourse Soc. 2005;16(3):419–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926505051173.
McKenzie-Mohr S, LaFrance M. Telling stories without the words: ‘Tight-rope talk’ in women’s accounts of coming to live well after rape or depression. Fem Psychol. 2011;21(1):49–73.
Niland P, Lyons AC. Uncertainty in medicine: meanings of menopause and hormone replacement therapy in medical textbooks. Soc Sci Med. 2011;73(8):1238–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.07.024.
Parker I. Discourse dynamics: critical analysis for social and individual psychology. London: Sage; 1992.
Parker I. Reflexive research and the grounding of analysis: social psychology and the psy-complex. J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 1994;4(4):239–52.
Parker I. Discursive social psychology now. Br J Soc Psychol. 2012;51(3):471–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02046.x.
Parton CM, Ussher JM, Perz J. Women’s construction of embodiment and the abject sexual body after cancer. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(4):490–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315570130.
Parton C, Ussher JM, Perz J. The medical body: women’s experiences of sexual embodiment across the cancer illness trajectory. Women’s Reprod Health. 2017;4(1):46–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/23293691.2017.1276370.
Potter J. Discourse analysis as a way of analysing naturally occuring talk. In: Silverman D, editor. Qualitative research: theory, method, practice. London: Sage; 2004. p. 200–21.
Potter J. Re-reading discourse and social psychology: transforming social psychology. Br J Soc Psychol. 2012;51(3):436–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02085.x.
Potter J, Wetherell M. Discourse and social psychology: beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage; 1987.
Rapley M. The social construction of intellectual disability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
Rowe R, Tilbury F, Rapley M, O’Ferrall I. ‘About a year before the breakdown I was having symptoms’: sadness, pathology and the Australian newspaper media. Sociol Health Illn. 2003;25(6):680–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.00365.
Sheriff M, Weatherall A. A feminist discourse analysis of popular-press accounts of postmaternity. Fem Psychol. 2009;19(1):89–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353508098621.
Sims-Schouten W, Riley SCE, Willig C. Critical realism in discourse analysis: a presentation of a systematic method of analysis using women’s talk of motherhood, childcare and female employment as an example. Theory Psychol. 2007;17(1):101–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354307073153.
Stenner P. Discoursing jealousy. In: Burman E, Parker I, editors. Discourse analytic research. London: Routledge; 1993. p. 114–34.
Tischner I, Malson H. Deconstructing health and the un/healthy fat woman. J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2012;22(1):50–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.1096.
Triandafilidis Z, Ussher JM, Perz J, Huppatz K. Doing and undoing femininities: an intersectional analysis of young women’s smoking. Fem Psychol. 2017a. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517693030.
Triandafilidis Z, Ussher JM, Perz J, Huppatz K. ‘It’s one of those “It’ll never happen to me” things’: young women’s constructions of smoking and risk. Health Risk Soc. 2017b;19:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2017.1384801.
Ussher JM. The role of premenstrual dysphoric disorder in the subjectification of women. J Med Humanit. 2003;24(1/2):131–46.
Ussher JM. Managing the monstrous feminine: regulating the reproductive body. London: Routledge; 2006.
Ussher JM. The madness of women: myth and experience. London: Routledge; 2011.
Ussher JM, Perz J. Disruption of the silenced-self: the case of pre-menstrual syndrome. In: Jack DC, Ali A, editors. The depression epidemic: international perspectives on women’s self-silencing and psychological distress. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 435–58.
Ussher JM, Perz J. PMS as a gendered illness linked to the construction and relational experience of hetero-femininity. Sex Roles. 2013;68(1–2):132–50.
Ussher JM, Perz J, Gilbert E, Wong WKT, Hobbs K. Renegotiating sex after cancer: resisting the coital imperative. Cancer Nurs. 2013;36(6):454–62. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0b013e3182759e21.
Watts S, O’Hara L, Trigg R. Living with type 1 diabetes: a by-person qualitative exploration. Psychol Health. 2009;25(4):491–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440802688588.
Wetherell M. Positioning and interpretative repertoires: conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse Soc. 1998;9(3):387–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926598009003005.
Wetherell M. Debates in discourse research. In: Wetherell M, Taylor S, Yates SJ, editors. Discourse theory and practice: a reader. London: Sage; 2001.
Willig C. A discourse-dynamic approach to the study of subjectivity in health psychology. Theory Psychol. 2000;10(4):547–70.
Willig C. Introducing qualitative methods in psychology: adventures in theory and method. Maidenhead: McGraw Hill; 2008.
Acknowledgements
Sections of this chapter draw on an earlier publication by the authors: Ussher, JM & Perz, J. (2014) Discourse Analysis. In: Poul Rohleder and Antonia Lyons (eds) Qualitative Research in Clinical and Health Psychology. London: Palgrave MacMillan (p. 218–237)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Ussher, J.M., Perz, J. (2018). Critical Discourse/Discourse Analysis. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_105-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_105-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2779-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2779-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences