Skip to main content

Spinoza (and) the Spider: Theorizing Childhood as Capacities of Affection and Affect

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Establishing Geographies of Children and Young People

Part of the book series: Geographies of Children and Young People ((GCYP,volume 1))

  • 177 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter theorizes childhood as capacities of affection and affect by working through the immanent philosophy of Benedict de Spinoza and intersecting some of its conceptual threads with Walter Benjamin’s understanding of children and revolutionary action through play. As part of this move, Spinoza is approached as both a complex weaver and intricate traverser of a web of immanence, and particular attention is paid to his characterization of the embodied imagination and its relationship to different forms of knowing and understanding. Spinoza’s ontological system of immanence in general – and his understanding of the embodied imagination in particular – provides promising metaphysical threads upon which to step away from notions of childhood or children as age-dependent representations or stages within identificational schemes of linear development to, instead, approach and understand them as immanent bodily capacities. The import of this move and the universal implications it holds for notions of political agency of children is also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Benjamin, W. (1978). Reflections: Essays, aphorisms, autobiographical writings. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, W. (1996). One-Way Street. In M. Bullock & M. W. Jennings (Eds.), Walter Benjamin: Selected writings (Vol. 1, pp. 1913–1926). Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, D. (1982). Spinoza’s spiders, Schopenhauer’s dogs. Philosophical Studies, 29, 202–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buck-Morss, S. (1991). The dialectics of seeing: Walter Benjamin and the arcades project. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buse, P., Hirschkop, K., McCracken, S., & Taithe, B. (2005). Benjamin’s arcades: An unGuided tour. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1988). Spinoza: Practical philosophy. San Francisco: City Light books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference & repetition. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations 1972–1990. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (2005). Expressionism in philosophy: Spinoza. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1986). Kafka: For a minor literature Kafka: For a minor literature. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. E. (2002). What does Spinoza’s ethics contribute to Jewish philosophy? In H. M. Ravven & L. E. Goodman (Eds.), Jewish themes in Spinoza’s philosophy (pp. 17–89). New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamacher, W. (2005). ‘Now’: Walter Benjamin on historical time. In A. Benjamin (Ed.), Walter Benjamin and history (pp. 38–67). New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasher, A., & Biderman, S. (2001). Why was Baruch de Spinoza excommunicated? In G. Lloyd (Ed.), Spinoza: Critical assessments of leading philosophers (pp. 59–99). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massumi, B. (1992). A user’s guide to capitalism and schizophrenia: Deviations from Deleuze and Guattari. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellamphy, D., & Mellamphy, N. B. (2009). What’s the ‘matter’ with materialism? Walter Benjamin and the New Janitocracy. Janus Head, 11(1), 163–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modern, J. L. (2006). Walter Benjamin’s 115th dream. Epoché: The University of California Journal for the Study of Religion, 24, 113–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montag, W. (2002). “That Hebrew Word”: Spinoza and the concept of the Shekinah. In H. M. Ravven & L. E. Goodman (Eds.), Jewish Themes in Spinoza’s philosophy (pp. 131–144). New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negri, A. (1991). The Savage anomaly: The power of Spinoza’s metaphysics and politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negri, A. (2004). Subversive Spinoza: (Un)Contemporary variations. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nidditch, P. H. (1964). Spinoza. In D. J. O’Connor (Ed.), A critical history of western philosophy (pp. 187–203). New York: The Free Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, C. (1991). Spinoza & the origins of modern critical theory. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, F., & Colerus, J. (1899). Spinoza: His life and philosophy. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranciére, J. (1996). The Archaeomodern turn. In M. P. Steinberg (Ed.), Walter Benjamin and the demands of history (pp. 24–40). New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savan, D. (1986). Spinoza: Scientist and theorist of scientific method. In M. G. Grene & D. Nails (Eds.), Spinoza and the sciences (pp. 95–123). Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scholem, G. (1976). In W. J. Dannhauser (Ed.), On Jews and Judaism in crisis: Selected essays. Philadelphia: Paul Dry Books, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, H. (2011). Animal affects: Spinoza and the frontiers of the human. Journal for Critical Animal Studies, 9(1/2), 48–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinoza, B. (1995). The Letters (trans: Shirley, S.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinoza, B. (1996). Ethics (ed and trans: Curley, E.). New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, M. (2006). The courtier and the heretic: Leibniz, Spinoza, and the fate of God in the modern world. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfson, H. A. (1969). The philosophy of Spinoza: Unfolding the latent processes of his reasoning (Vol. I and II). New York: Schocken Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yovel, Y. (1986). Nietzsche and Spinoza: amor fati and amor dei. In Y. Yovel (Ed.), Nietzsche as affirmative thinker (pp. 183–203). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zweig, A. (1939). The living thoughts of Spinoza. New York: Longmans, Green and Co.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giorgio Hadi Curti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this entry

Cite this entry

Curti, G.H. (2016). Spinoza (and) the Spider: Theorizing Childhood as Capacities of Affection and Affect. In: Skelton, T., Aitken, S. (eds) Establishing Geographies of Children and Young People. Geographies of Children and Young People, vol 1. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-88-0_2-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-88-0_2-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-4585-88-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics