Skip to main content

Games with Incomplete Information

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 271 Accesses

Abstract

Classical economic models almost universally assume that the resources and preferences of individuals (or firms) are known not only to the individuals themselves but also to their competitors. In practice, this assumption is rarely correct. Once the attempt is made to include uncertainty (not just about the environment but also about other strategic actors) within economic models, it becomes necessary to broaden those models substantially, to include considerations about the beliefs of individuals concerning the status of their competitors, as well as about learning as it takes place over time. A standard approach for doing this is to model the situation under investigation as a game with incomplete information, and to study the (Bayesian) equilibrium points of that game.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Akerlof, G. 1970. The market for lemons: Qualitative uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics 84: 488–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J.C. 1967–8. Games with incomplete information played by Bayesian players. Management Science 14: 159–82, 320–34, 486–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J.C. 1973. Games with randomly-distributed payoffs: A new rationale for mixed-strategy equilibrium points. International Journal of Game Theory 2: 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. 1985. Nonzero-sum two-person repeated games with incomplete information. Mathematics of Operations Research 10: 117–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D.M., and R. Wilson. 1982. Sequential equilibria. Econometrica 50: 863–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D.M., P. Milgrom, J. Roberts, and R. Wilson. 1982. Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated Prisoner’s dilemma. Journal of Economic Theory 27: 245–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, J.-F., and S. Zamir. 1985. Formulation of Bayesian analysis for games with incomplete information. International Journal of Game Theory 14: 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P.R., and R.J. Weber. 1985. Distributional strategies for games with incomplete information. Mathematics of Operations Research 10: 619–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, R.B. 1984. Two-person bargaining problems with incomplete information. Econometrica 52: 461–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, A. 1982. Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica 50: 97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R. 1975. Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibriu points in extensive games. International Journal of Game Theory 4: 25–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Weber, R.J. (2018). Games with Incomplete Information. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1142

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics