Skip to main content

Agricultural Supply

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 22 Accesses

Abstract

One of the earliest-investigated and most fruitful areas for econometric studies has been the estimation of agricultural supply functions. Studies date back at least to the work of Smith (1928) and Bean (1929) on US agriculture in the 1920s. Early studies adopted a fairly static view. Nerloveā€™s (1958) work on The Dynamics of Supply, with adaptive price expectations and adjustment processes for United States agriculture, spawned renewed interest in specification and estimation issues on this topic. The roughly concurrent controversies about market responsiveness in developing-country agriculture (e.g., Schultz 1964) led to a shift in emphasis towards this concern. In the last quarter century a veritable flood of such studies has appeared. More recently supply studies have incorporated more systematic emphasis on systemic characteristics, risk aversion, the household/farm model framework and alternative price expectations. This article reviews these basic developments in empirical studies of agricultural supply by starting with the most common framework for such analyses and then considering what questions arise when some of the traditional assumptions are weakened.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Askari, H., and J.T. Cummings. 1976. Agricultural supply response: A survey of the econometric evidence. New York: Praeger Publishers.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Askari, H., and J.T. Cummings. 1977. Estimating agricultural supply response with the Nerlove model: A survey. International Economic Review 18: 257ā€“292.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bapna, S.L., H. Binswanger, and J.B. Quizon. 1984. Systems of output supply and factor demand equations for semi-arid tropical India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics 39(2): 179ā€“202.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Barnum, H.N., and L. Squire. 1979a. An econometric application of the theory of farm-household. Journal of Development Economics 6(1): 79ā€“102.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Barnum, H.N., and L. Squire. 1979b. A model of an agriculture household: Theory and evidence. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins for the World Bank. chs 3ā€“6.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bateman, M. 1965. Aggregate and regional supply functions for Ghanaian cocoa, 1946ā€“62. Journal of Farm Economics 47: 384ā€“401.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bateman, M. 1968. Cocoa in the Ghanaian economy: An econometric model. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bean, L.H. 1929. The farmersā€™ response to price. Journal of Farm Economics 11: 368ā€“385.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Behrman, J.R. 1966. Price elasticity of the marketed surplus of a subsistence crop. Journal of Farm Economics 48: 875ā€“893.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Behrman, J.R. 1968a. Monopolistic cocoa pricing. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 50: 702ā€“719.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Behrman, J.R. 1968b. Supply response in underdeveloped agriculture: A case study of four major annual crops in Thailand 1937ā€“1963. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Behrman, J.R. 1969. Econometric model simulations of the world rubber market 1950ā€“1980. In Essays in industrial econometrics, vol. 3, ed. L.R. Klein. Philadelphia: Economic Research Unit, Wharton School of Finance and Commerce, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Behrman, J.R., and A.B.. Deolalikar. 1987. Health and nutrition. In Handbook on development economics, ed. H.B. Chenery and T.N. Srinivasan. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Binswanger, H.P. 1980. Attitudes towards risk: Experimental measurement evidence in rural India. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 62(3): 395ā€“407.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Binswanger, H.P. 1981. Attitudes towards risk: Theoretical implications of an experiment in rural India. Economic Journal 91: 867ā€“890.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Binswanger, H.P. 1982. Empirical estimation and use of risk preferences: Discussion. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 64(2): 391ā€“393.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Binswanger, H., Y. Mundlak, M.C. Yang, and A. Bowers. 1985. Estimation of aggregate supply response. Washington, DC: World Bank. Report No. ARU 48.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bliss, C., and N. Stern. 1978a. Productivity, wages and nutrition, part I: The theory. Journal of Development Economics 5(4): 331ā€“362.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bliss, C., and N. Stern. 1978b. Productivity, wages and nutrition, part II: Some observations. Journal of Development Economics 5(4): 363ā€“398.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Eckstein, Z. 1984. A rational expectations model of agricultural supply. Journal of Political Economy 92(1): 1ā€“19.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • French, B.C., and J.L. Matthews. 1971. A supply response model for perennial crops. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 53: 478ā€“490.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Jarvis, L. 1974. Cattle as capital goods and ranchers as portfolio managers: An application to the Argentine cattle sector. Journal of Political Economy 82: 489ā€“520.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Krishna, R. 1963. Farm supply response in Indiaā€“Pakistan: A case study of the Punjab region. Economic Journal 73: 477ā€“487.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Krishna, R. 1965. The marketable surplus function for a subsistence crop: An analysis with Indian data. Economic Weekly 17.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Lau, L.J., and P.A. Yotopoulos. 1971. A test for relative efficiency and application to Indian agriculture. American Economic Review 61: 94ā€“109.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Lau, L.J., W.-L. Lin, and P. Yotopoulos. 1978. The linear logarithmic expenditure system: An application to consumption-leisure choice. Econometrica 46(4): 843ā€“868.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Leibenstein, H. 1957. Economic backwardness and economic growth. New York: Wiley.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Muth, J.F. 1961. Rational expectations and the theory of price movements. Econometrica 29: 315ā€“335.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Nerlove, M. 1956. Estimates of supply of selected agricultural commodities. Journal of Farm Economics 38: 496ā€“509.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Nerlove, M. 1958. The dynamics of supply: Estimation of Farmersā€™ response to price. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Nerlove, M. 1967. Distributed lags and unobserved components in economic time series. In Ten economic essays in the tradition of Irving fisher, ed. W. Fellner et al., 126ā€“169. New York: Wiley.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Nerlove, M. 1979. The dynamics of supply: Retrospect and prospect. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 61(5): 867ā€“888.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Newbery, D.M.G., and J.E. Stiglitz. 1981. The theory of commodity price stabilization. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Nowshirvani, V. 1971. Land allocation under uncertainty in subsistence agriculture. Oxford Economic Papers 23: 445ā€“455.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Peterson, W.L. 1979. International farm prices and the social cost of cheap food policies. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 61: 12ā€“21.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Pitt, M.M., and M. Rosenzweig. 1986. Agricultural prices, food consumption and the health and productivity of farmers. In Agricultural household models: Extensions, applications and policy, ed. I.J. Singh, L. Squire, and J. Strauss. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Schultz, T.W. 1964. Transforming traditional agriculture. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Schultz, T.W. 1975. The value of the ability to deal with disequilibrium. Journal of Economic Literature 13: 827ā€“846.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Smith, B.B. 1928. Factors affecting the price of cotton. US Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin No. 50, Washington, DC.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Stiglitz, J. 1976. The efficiency wage hypothesis, surplus labour, and the distribution of income in LDCā€™s. Oxford Economic Papers, New Series 28: 185ā€“207.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Strauss, J. 1986. Does better nutrition raise farm productivity? Journal of Political Economy 94(2): 297ā€“320.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

Ā© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Behrman, J.R. (2018). Agricultural Supply. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_153

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics