Abstract
Ecological inference is a general statistical problem where a response variable is not available at the subject level because summary statistics are reported for groups only. It consists of merging information from different databases which are not linked to each other at the record level. We consider an election scenario where in each electoral precinct the fraction of voting-age people who turn out to vote, the fraction of black population and the number of voting-age people are observed. The proportions of blacks and of whites who vote are unobserved because electoral results and census data are not linked.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Achen, C., and W. Shively. 1995. Cross-level inference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Adolph, C., G. King, M. Herron, and K. Shotts. 2003. A consensus position on second stage ecological inference models. Political Analysis 11: 86–94.
Duncan, O., and B. Davis. 1953. An alternative to ecological correlation. American Sociological Review 18: 665–666.
Goodman, L. 1953. Ecological regressions and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review 18: 663–666.
Goodman, L. 1959. Some alternatives to ecological correlation. American Journal of Sociology 64: 610–624.
King, G. 1997. A solution to the ecological inference problem: Reconstructing individual behavior from aggregate data. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
King, G., O. Rosen, and M. Tanner. 1999. Binomial-beta hierarchical models for ecological inference. Sociological Methods and Research 28: 61–90.
King, G., O. Rosen, and M. Tanner, eds. 2004. Ecological inference: New methodological strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
King, G., O. Rosen, M. Tanner, and A. Wagner. 2003. The ordinary election of Adolf Hitler: A modern voting behavior approach. Online. Available at https://gking.harvard.edu/files/gking/files/nazivp.pdf Accessed 16 Aug 2006.
Ogburn, W., and I. Goltra. 1919. How women vote: A study of an election in Portland, Oregon. Political Science Quarterly 34: 413–433.
Rosen, O., W. Jiang, G. King, and M. Tanner. 2001. Bayesian and frequentist inference for ecological inference: The R × C case. Statistica Neerlandica 55(2): 134–156.
Staniswalis, J. 2005. On fitting generalized non-linear models with varying coefficients. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 50: 893–902.
Tanner, M. 1996. Tools for statistical inference: Methods for the exploration of posterior distributions and likelihood functions. 3rd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Wakefield, J. 2004. Prior and likelihood choices in the analysis of ecological data. In Ecological inference: New methodological strategies, ed. G. King, O. Rosen, and M. Tanner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
King, G., Rosen, O., Tanner, M. (2018). Ecological Inference. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2336
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2336
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95188-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95189-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences